One sentence really stood out for me in Dron's post from last Friday ("What is Connectivism?"):
More is different in a networked system, resulting in a) large scale patterns and emergent behaviours not usually seen in smaller systems, and b) linear benefits of scale - a 1% contribution rate in a network of 10 people will be of a lot less value to all the people in that network than 1% contribution rate in a network of a million people.It's not something that is a new concept to me - but it made me reflect on my project and how it performs, and has made me think differently other things I've read since then. That 1% contribution rate is not an unreasonable estimate of how likely people are to add ideas into a network if there are no extrinsic motivators; but then the network of ten people most likely has no contributors, and the network of a million has ten thousand. Ten thousand contributors can generate an awful lot of of content, and communities can be formed around that content. My own data bears these numbers out:
I have a group of over a thousand potential contributors - but only 37 (3.3%) have uploaded anything, and only 11 (1%) have contributed five or more resources. There is almost certainly not enough content and activity to generate a significant community around these resources.
I intend to keep improving resource tools in the hope of lowering the barriers to participation to the point where a community can self-start based on these numbers. But this has been a clarion call for me to start thinking about problems of network scale, and what they mean for my project.

No comments:
Post a Comment